<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Banner Links Help With SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.komarketingassociates.com/blog/can-banner-links-help-with-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.komarketingassociates.com/blog/can-banner-links-help-with-seo/</link>
	<description>Our goal for this blog is to present different ideas, thoughts and answers that relate to the worlds of SEO, Search Marketing, PPC and Internet Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:41:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Komack</title>
		<link>http://www.komarketingassociates.com/blog/can-banner-links-help-with-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1637</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Komack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.komarketingassociates.com/blog/?p=275#comment-1637</guid>
		<description>@Scott - This post was definitely centered around the value of banner ads from a link building/link popularity perspective.  I see now that I did not provide an opinion on whether or not this was an effective tactic.

My philosophy on link building in general is that you should only pursue an individual link opportunity if there is intrinsic value in being present on the site, and don&#039;t do it JUST for link building.  This goes for banner ads and text links alike.

If you are responsible for generating leads, then pursue a link if you think it will help with this goal (e.g. people will see the banner/link and click on it to come to your site and convert).

If you are responsible for generating traffic only (this would be too bad because this means you are probably not effectively targeting profit goals) - then you would care about the CTR of the banner/link.

If you are responsible for generating ad revenue on your own site - you would want a combination of a high CTR &amp; engagement on your site once people arrive (e.g. high pageview counts, low bounce rates, viewing the most valuable content, etc.)

If you are responsible for branding - then you would look at a combination of impressions for the ad/banner/link &amp; visits to the site + engagement on your site after arrival).

To answer your question directly - not all banners are created equal.  It will depend on the quality of the site you are placing the ads on, the creative you use for the banners, etc.  

That said, I personally encourage clients to pursue banner advertising as one of their last options.

Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott &#8211; This post was definitely centered around the value of banner ads from a link building/link popularity perspective.  I see now that I did not provide an opinion on whether or not this was an effective tactic.</p>
<p>My philosophy on link building in general is that you should only pursue an individual link opportunity if there is intrinsic value in being present on the site, and don&#8217;t do it JUST for link building.  This goes for banner ads and text links alike.</p>
<p>If you are responsible for generating leads, then pursue a link if you think it will help with this goal (e.g. people will see the banner/link and click on it to come to your site and convert).</p>
<p>If you are responsible for generating traffic only (this would be too bad because this means you are probably not effectively targeting profit goals) &#8211; then you would care about the CTR of the banner/link.</p>
<p>If you are responsible for generating ad revenue on your own site &#8211; you would want a combination of a high CTR &#038; engagement on your site once people arrive (e.g. high pageview counts, low bounce rates, viewing the most valuable content, etc.)</p>
<p>If you are responsible for branding &#8211; then you would look at a combination of impressions for the ad/banner/link &#038; visits to the site + engagement on your site after arrival).</p>
<p>To answer your question directly &#8211; not all banners are created equal.  It will depend on the quality of the site you are placing the ads on, the creative you use for the banners, etc.  </p>
<p>That said, I personally encourage clients to pursue banner advertising as one of their last options.</p>
<p>Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Alden</title>
		<link>http://www.komarketingassociates.com/blog/can-banner-links-help-with-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Alden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.komarketingassociates.com/blog/?p=275#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>So just how effective are you finding these banner ads really are?  We got totally out of the banner ad game long ago.  Companies telling me that 1.5% click through rates were amazing, we were paying through the nose, and the conversions were low.  Then with the introduction of Ad Blockers, we threw in the towel.  I&#039;m sure there is &quot;some&quot; value here but really, we have felt straight SEO and PPC has given us a much larger bang for our buck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So just how effective are you finding these banner ads really are?  We got totally out of the banner ad game long ago.  Companies telling me that 1.5% click through rates were amazing, we were paying through the nose, and the conversions were low.  Then with the introduction of Ad Blockers, we threw in the towel.  I&#8217;m sure there is &#8220;some&#8221; value here but really, we have felt straight SEO and PPC has given us a much larger bang for our buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
